A bit of radio history!

[Dude111]

Thanks for the link, but it didn't work for me. I look forward to your fixing the problem so I can enjoy it.

Hmm click the link @ the bottom that says "Impaitent?" and it will load the page buddy

[MobilePCPhysician]

That is eleven pages. What are you trying to say?

[slgrieb]

That is eleven pages. What are you trying to say?

Yeah, back in the day, I was a Radio-TV-Film major at the University of Texas at Austin. I bet that between required courses in the Department of Communications. Pre-Law, and Political Science courses I took I've got a better grounding in all U.S. laws governing fair use and copyright than you have Dude.

It isn't enough to simply cite a law, and assume that makes a point. If you want to debate the current crappy state of U.S. copyright law, it's helpful if you can pinpoint an issue we can discuss. Is the industry inspired Digital Millennium Copyright Act legislation that has overturned nearly a century of legislation and legal practice an abridgment of citizen rights ? Yes. Do you really understand the issue? I doubt it. Henceforth, if you respond to any of my posts, you will address me as Sensei.

[Niclo Iste]

I don't know, I mean I find it more interesting to read federal documents that were written prior to the 1960s. They always seemed more to the point and not full of double sided vague terms like todays documents. So just looking at that was good enough for me. Sometimes you just have to stop and see the forest for the trees.

[slgrieb]

I don't know, I mean I find it more interesting to read federal documents that were written prior to the 1960s. They always seemed more to the point and not full of double sided vague terms like todays documents. So just looking at that was good enough for me. Sometimes you just have to stop and see the forest for the trees.

I think Dude111 has a habit of not coming to the point (Except for his problem with the pending software upgrade) and I find that both annoying and frustrating. What is the sound of one hand not clapping?

[Dude111]

I just dont like things GETTING WORSE,quality going down... What is wrong with that??

I don't know, I mean I find it more interesting to read federal documents that were written prior to the 1960s. They always seemed more to the point and not full of double sided vague terms like todays documents.

Yup im glad you can see this also.... Stuff was MUCH BETTER back then..... Quality was 100% better,people cared about what they did,etc.......

I think its very well written!

[slgrieb]

I just dont like things GETTING WORSE,quality going down... What is wrong with that??

Yup im glad you can see this also.... Stuff was MUCH BETTER back then..... Quality was 100% better,people cared about what they did,etc.......

I think its very well written!

There's nothing wrong with being passionate and committed. If you want to persuade people, you need to focus on practical issues that motivate them or find a way to inspire them. All the same, don't fall into the trap of believing in a "Golden Age". That's all myth and wishful thinking. Time is a one way street. You can make tomorrow better, but you can't make it yesterday.